“[T]he fragment as employed by Schlegel and the Romantics is distinctive in both its form (as a collection of pieces by several different authors) and its purpose. For Schlegel, a fragment as a particular has a certain unity ('[a] fragment, like a small work of art, has to be entirely isolated from the surrounding world and be complete in itself like a hedgehog', Athenaeumsfragment 206), but remains nonetheless fragmentary in the perspective it opens up and in its opposition to other fragments. Its ‘unity’ thus reflects Schlegel's view of the whole of things not as a totality but rather as a ‘chaotic universality’ of infinite opposing stances.“
(Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Sinä, kirjanystävä, parantumaton varhaisromantikko, varaa itsellesi aikaa hemmotteluun ja kehon kokonaisvaltaiseen hoitoon, tilaa!
Ensyklopedia ei sovita vastakohtia! Se ruokkii positioiden välistä kaoottista peliä! Nouseeko Suomi viimein polvilleen? Kuuluuko metsän pimeydestä Jenan harlekiinien laulu? Mieti kuule sitä siellä rantasaunan terassilla.
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti